• The Great Wall

The Great Wall (Photo : fyeah!luhan/YouTube)

Although “The Great Wall’ earned $171 million when it was exhibited in China, in North America, the movie earned only $34.8 million, not enough for producers to recover their capital. With $75 million loss, there is now a question if Universal Pictures and its Chinese partners would make more movie collaboration in the future.

Like Us on Facebook

Production Cost Split

About $150 million was spent on producing the movie, but another $80 million was spent on marketing the movie globally. About one-fourth of the production cost came from Universal Pictures, while Legendary Entertainment, China Film Group and Le Vision Pictures split the remaining 75 percent, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

While film industry experts agree that “The Great Wall” is a failure, the share of Universal Pictures in the loss would be relatively smaller. It would still get about 10 percent distribution fee from all cinema revenue – or about 40 to 50 percent of the film’s box office – plus box-office rentals that it would recover a substantial part of the marketing cost.

Ancillary Revenue

There is future income from ancillary revenue such as international and domestic home entertainment, and TV, to further reduce Universal’s loss from the venture. But studios would still view co-productions with China with skepticism, and despite the relatively good financial return, the studios would rather focus on strategic partnerships to further boost their returns.

But despite the failure suffered by “The Great Wall,” Eric Handler, analyst of MKM Partners, believes Hollywood producers would be back for more co-productions because the market opportunities are very substantial to ignore. He explained, “The problem with ‘The Great Wall’ in the U.S. was poor reviews. At some point, someone will find the right formula.”

Cinema Blend also noted that the movie started on a bad footing when Matt Damon’s choice as lead actor was heavily criticized for white washing. Although the actor, director and producers defended the decision, it “left a bad taste in the mouth” and affected domestic box-office results.