Paul George (Photo : Getty Images)
The LA Lakers got through the first step of their rebuilding process and that is to keep their draft pick.
Despite the precarious protection (top 3) on their pick, the Lakers managed to stay put (as did all the teams) at no.2. Now, the question is what they will do with it?
Recent reports by ESPN Insider Chad Ford had the Lakers possibly trading away their pick if it landed at no.3.
"However, if the Lakers fall to to No. 3, things get tougher. Neither Murray nor Dunn fits a need. Bender is intriguing, but a project," Ford said.
He concludes: "Multiple sources said at the combine this week that they expect the pick to be in play if it's No. 3 -- with the Lakers looking for a young veteran in return."
One of the rumors that floated around was Paul George of the Indiana Pacers in the hopes that his California roots might bring him home. It was considered a far-fetched concept but recent developments may have swung the odds slightly in the Lakers' favor.
The talks can finally get serious and Bleacher Report took note that George himself may be in favor of a trade.
"The Lakers also can attract potential trade targets (and free agents) with newly christened head coach Luke Walton," the article stated. "George, for example, might like the idea of playing for Walton and whatever ideas he imports from his time at Golden State over the plodding pace he is likely to see under new Pacers head coach Nate McMillan."
The drop-off from pick no.2 to no.3 is significant whereas most teams would be fine with either Brandon Ingram or Ben Simmons at the top 2 slot. Thus, the game changes now that the Lakers have the 2nd pick. But B/R believes it's still in play, just that the Lakers have more power now.
"Of course, the Lakers might be willing to part with the No. 1 or No. 2 pick if it gives them the opportunity to land a superstar even greater than the likes of George."
If the Lakers offer the 2nd pick plus D'Angelo Russell, it could be a reasonable haul for George. Larry Bird might think differently, though.
